Tools for Program Evaluation
Persistence in the Sciences (PITS) Survey
Persistence in the Sciences (PITS) assessment survey is designed to measure student psychological outcomes in course-based research experiences (CREs). The description of the instrument and establishment of its validity is presented in the following paper.
Hanauer DI, Graham MJ, Hatfull GF. A Measure of College Student Persistence in the Sciences (PITS). Brickman P, ed. CBE Life Sciences Education. 2016;15(4):ar54. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-09-0185.
The Project Ownership Survey
This survey aims to measure a component of the research experience thought to be an important element in the overall impact of a research experience on student outcomes. The development, evaluation and validity of the instrument is presented in the publication below.
Hanauer DI, Dolan EL. The Project Ownership Survey: Measuring Differences in Scientific Inquiry Experiences. Smith M, ed. CBE Life Sciences Education. 2014;13(1):149-158. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-06-0123.
Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA)
This instrument is intended to measure the outcomes of research experience, and was developed from empirical evidence from a large qualitative study. Subsequent work has explored the validity of the survey (Weston and Laursen, 2015).
Hunter A-B, Weston TJ, Laursen SL, Thiry H. URSSA: evaluating student gains from undergraduate research in the sciences. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 2009; 29:15–19.
Weston T, Laursen S. The Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA): validation for use in program evaluation. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015; 14:ar33.
Originally funded by HHMI, the SURE (Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences) survey and related instruments (CURE, RISC, SEA CURE) have been used to measure student perception of gains in areas related to the undergraduate research experience. Although information concerning this instrument's theoretical basis, validity, or reliability is not published, the surveys are freely available on the Grinnell College website https://www.grinnell.edu/academics/areas/psychology/assessments.
Lopatto, D. (2008). Exploring the benefits of undergraduate research: The SURE survey. In R. Taraban & R.L. Blanton (Eds.), Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science. NY: Teacher's College Press (pp. 112-132).
HHMI supports talented scientists and educators to advance biomedical research and train the next generation of scientific leaders. Our work is shaped by three core values:
The advancement of science depends on the development of scientific thinking skills and values in every citizen, including students who will become scientists.Explore our strategies »
The future of science depends on students at all stages learning the process of science by engaging in discovery-based experiences and scientific research.Explore our strategies »
Scientific excellence depends on the development of scientific leaders who come from all backgrounds and who are nurtured by an inclusive environment.Explore our strategies »