Home About Press Employ Contact Spyglass Advanced Search
HHMI Logo
HHMI News
HHMI News
Scientists & Research
Scientists & Research
Janelia Farm
Janelia Farm
Grants & Fellowships
Grants & Fellowships
Resources
Resources
HHMI Bulletin
Current Issue Subscribe
Back Issues About the Bulletin
February '06
Features
divider

A Cell's Second Act

divider

Trailblazer Turned
Superstarsmall arrow


divider

Optical Aspirationssmall arrow

divider

A Way Station
After Katrinasmall arrow


divider
Cech
divider
UpFront
divider
Chronicle
divider
Perspectives
divider
Editor

Subscribe Free
Sign up now and receive the HHMI Bulletin by mail free.small arrow

FEATURES: A Cell's Second Act

PAGE 2 OF 5

"Reprogramming"—the erasure of a cell's developmental history— enables it to start over as an uncommitted embryonic cell. The process is central to cloning, which creates an exact copy of an adult organism from the genetic material in one of its cells. A notable example was the birth of Dolly the lamb in 1996, the first mammalian clone. She developed from a fully differentiated adult cell whose nucleus had been turned back in time, developmentally speaking, so that its full set of genes was once again in its original, embryonic state—and capable of giving rise to a new animal genetically identical to Dolly's donor.

First observed and confirmed in a series of experiments from the late 1950s to the mid-1970s, reprogramming is still something of a "black box" to scientists. It appears that unknown factors in the egg's cytoplasm signal the nucleus to erase its specialized genetic program and reactivate previously silenced genes that support the development of a new embryo. But little is known about what these essential factors are or how they turn back the developmental clock.

"It's a wonderful problem and an incredibly fascinating subject," says Allan C. Spradling, a developmental biologist and HHMI investigator at the Carnegie Institution of Washington in Baltimore. "You're talking about one of the most fundamental of the processes that make life possible."

But limited understanding of the process explains why cloning is still an inefficient and error-prone technology. And that hampers the promise of "regenerative medicine"—generating rejection-free repair tissues by cloning a patient's own body cells. The hope is to improve treatments for neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, diabetes, heart disease, and spinal cord injuries, for example.

Following the birth of Dolly, pigs, mice, calves, and other animals have been cloned through the transfer of adult-cell nuclei into unfertilized eggs. In addition to nuclear transfer, reprogramming can also be induced by the fusion of certain cells. In 2005, biologist Kevin Eggan and HHMI investigator Douglas A. Melton at Harvard University succeeded in reprogramming human adult skin cells to revert to an embryonic state by fusing them with stem cells removed from embryos. Evidently, the embryonic stem cells contained something that could reawaken the embryonic genes in the skin cells. But there was a problem: The resulting embryonic cells contained a double set of chromosomes, an abnormality that made them unsuitable for practical cloning.

Using his own approach, Yuri Verlinsky, of the Reproductive Genetics Institute in Chicago, reported in the January issue of the journal Reproductive BioMedicine Online that he had fused several types of human somatic cells with human embryonic stem cells, and that in some instances the adult nuclei had completely replaced the stem cell nuclei, leaving only one set of chromosomes.

These were patient-specific embryonic stem cells, Verlinsky notes. But when grown in culture, some of the cells had both donor and recipient nuclei, so they'll need further purification before they have any practical value.

These studies and many other lines of research aim to elucidate the factors needed for reprogramming, and eventually free the cloning process from the need for unfertilized eggs or embryos, which are scarce and expensive, and raise ethical concerns.

dividers
PAGE 2 OF 5
small arrow Go Back | Continue small arrow
dividers
Download Story PDF
Requires Adobe Acrobat
Email This Story

HHMI INVESTIGATOR

Allan C. Spradling
Allan C. Spradling
 

HHMI INVESTIGATOR

Douglas A. Melton
Douglas A. Melton
 
Related Links

AT HHMI

bullet icon

Researchers Identify Fruit Fly Intestinal
Stem Cells

(12.07.05)

bullet icon

Nature's Way
(Bulletin: Spring 2005)

bullet icon

Cells De-Differentiate Back into Stem Cells
(03.14.04)

bullet icon

Healing Connections
(Bulletin: December 2002)

bullet icon

New Technique for Creating Human Stem Cells
(08.22.05)

bullet icon

Insulin-Producing Pancreatic Cells Are Replenished by Duplication
(05.05.04)

bullet icon

New Human Embryonic Stem-Cell Lines
(03.03.04)

bullet icon

Are Stem Cells the Answer?
(Bulletin: March 2002)

ON THE WEB

external link icon

Stem Cell Basics

external link icon

Cloning Fact Sheet

external link icon

Frontline: Making Babies: Human Cloning

external link icon

Harvard Stem Cell Institute

external link icon

Epigenetics: Genome, Meet Your Environment

external link icon

Science Museum: Dolly the Sheep, 1996-2003

external link icon

Cell Migration

dividers
Back to Topto the top
HHMI Logo

Home | About HHMI | Press Room | Employment | Contact

© 2012 Howard Hughes Medical Institute. A philanthropy serving society through biomedical research and science education.
4000 Jones Bridge Road, Chevy Chase, MD 20815-6789 | (301) 215-8500 | e-mail: webmaster@hhmi.org