Home About Press Employ Contact Spyglass Advanced Search
HHMI Logo
 

 

Related Stories:

Frankenstein Today: The Postgenomic Prometheus

Genetics and Human Nature

Gene Science: From Mendel to Molecule

In the first half of the 20th century, genetics was the study of inherited traits. Though DNA was unknown, genetic inheritance could be predicted with remarkable precision. Genetics was applied to the breeding of animals and plants, as well as to explaining of human inherited disorders. The discovery of DNA, followed by the invention of recombinant DNA, the ability to combine DNA from two unrelated species, led to fears of genetic disaster that at first nearly overwhelmed the potential applications for agriculture and medicine. But as the immediate fears have failed to materialize, the applications of gene science have multiplied. Genetics forms the basis of entire new industries and generates frequent headlines of futuristic advances, such as cloning, gene therapy, genetic testing, and stem-cell therapies.

Various dimensions of genetic science are touched upon in the science fiction stories described here. In Kurt Vonnegut’s Galapagos, evolution is a central theme. In Michael Crichton’s Jurassic Park, the potential of recombinant DNA is explored. Finally, Bruce Sterling’s Distraction brings us into the postgenomic era.

Galapagos, by Kurt Vonnegut (1985)
Vonnegut imagines what might happen to human beings if our species evolves according to the rules of genetic inheritance and natural selection. He imagines a world in which human technology leads to an environmental disaster that kills off all but a handful of humans, who escape to an island of the Galapagos. The isolated humans evolve into fishlike creatures with degenerate brains. For all its surreal humor, Galapagos is virtually a textbook of Mendelian inheritance and evolution.

Discussion Questions
1. Galapagos shows several examples of inherited defects, most of them based on actual known genes inherited by Mendelian rules—for example, the brain defect inherited by the von Kleist brother, and Akiko’s blindness. Which of the disease genes are recessive? Dominant? X-linked?

2. The human population decreases so fast that it experiences a “population bottleneck,” a severe reduction in size that reduces diversity. Why can a population bottleneck lead to rapid evolution? Considering our knowledge of the human genome, when did the human species (or its predecessor) experience a population bottleneck? What was the result?

3. After the population bottleneck in Galapagos, the deterioration of human brainpower is explained by “degenerative evolution,” the gradual loss of traits that are not under selection pressure in a given environment. What other examples of degenerative evolution does Vonnegut cite throughout his book? Why does the protagonist argue that human brains have become too big for our own good and hence have lost their survival value? Does the book’s ending suggest a way out of this dilemma?

4. Can we see molecular examples of degenerative evolution in the human genome? What kind of genetic elements do not receive selection pressure and therefore tend to degenerate?

Jurassic Park, by Michael Crichton (1990)
This classic tale of dinosaur resurrection gone wrong expresses the early fears of some of the very geneticists who invented recombinant DNA. A biotechnology company heedless of anything but profit tries to recreate dinosaurs from fossil DNA, with a few frog genes carelessly spliced in. While ostensibly about dinosaurs, this story plays upon the fears first arising in the 1970s that recombining DNA from different species could create monsters, virulent plagues, and ecological disasters. Most geneticists today believe these fears are overblown, although concerns continue to loom large in the public mind and in the media.

Discussion Questions
1. In the prologue to Jurassic Park, Crichton presents commercial genetic engineering as an enterprise totally lacking regulation. To what extent is this accurate today? What regulations exist, and what regulation fails to occur?

2. Would it be possible to recreate dinosaur chromosomes from samples of ancient DNA? What technical steps would be necessary?

3. Would it be possible to use the recreated dinosaur chromosomes to create living cells and entire dinosaurs? What else besides chromosomes would it take to build a living cell?

Distraction, by Bruce Sterling (1998)
In Sterling’s chaotic future America, the environment has been destroyed by greed and political disintegration. Recombinant DNA is no longer feared, and genetic engineering is taken for granted. In an America distracted by wars local and foreign, budget battles are fought with real weapons. When the federal governmental threatens to cut off funds, a research institute that breeds endangered species faces its own financial extinction.

Discussion Questions
1. The protagonist of Distraction, political operative Oscar Valparaiso, is the product of the careless black-market production of human clones, in which a lot of the noncoding “junk” DNA is removed in order to replicate chromosomes more efficiently and to grow the embryos more quickly. Considering recent findings in the genome, why might removal of noncoding DNA lead to the kind of developmental abnormalities that Oscar suffers?

2. The Buna National Research Collaboratory rescues and restores species of animals driven extinct by humanity. What challenges do the scientists face in technology and in politics? Compare their predicament and response with those of the dinosaur regeneration program of Jurassic Park. What choices do they make, and what solutions do they find?

3. When Oscar asks the head of the Collaboratory, Dr. Greta Penninger, what she desires, she says she wants a return to the “Golden Age,” when a good grant proposal always got funded. Why does Dr. Penninger think this Golden Age disappeared? Why does Oscar think it disappeared? In real science, where does funding come from? Who funded the Human Genome Project, and who is funding its applications now?

4. In the end, how do the Collaboratory scientists rescue their project and secure the future of their laboratory? What does this suggest about the responsibility of scientists to pursue community outreach?

 

 
HHMI Logo

Home | About HHMI | Press Room | Employment | Contact

© 2013 Howard Hughes Medical Institute. A philanthropy serving society through biomedical research and science education.
4000 Jones Bridge Road Chevy Chase, MD 20815-6789 | (301) 215-8500 | email: webmaster@hhmi.org